Tuesday, June 7, 2011

kim kardashian 2011

kim kardashian 2011. kim kardashian 2011.
  • kim kardashian 2011.


  • kewlchap
    09-09 01:17 AM
    Hi greencard_fever,

    How did you open a SR for your wife's case (which had an RFE)? I responded to an RFE and they say that I have to wait 60 days before opening an SR. Please let me know.




    kim kardashian 2011. kim kardashian hair color 2011
  • kim kardashian hair color 2011


  • styrum
    11-10 04:44 PM
    Thanks folks for all the replies. I got to know finally that the employer can setup the LC to provide for any relocation. It looks like my employer usually does that so that the employees does not loose out in a relocation scenario.

    Thanks for all the inputs

    Please somebody clarify how exactly this is done with PERM. If it's a consulting company, should all advertisement, PWD and Job Order be done in the location of the main office? The job location indicated on the PERM should also then be the main office, but the job description must mention that projects may be located all over US? There is really no place on the PERM form for "alternate" location. Where is that exception for consulting companies mentioned? Can somebody please clarify?




    kim kardashian 2011. kim kardashian 2011. kim
  • kim kardashian 2011. kim


  • sledge_hammer
    07-01 12:54 PM
    The amended H-1B by itself will not be an issue when it comes to GC.

    My question was more about why for "rajuseattle" there was going to be AC21 since his job location has not changed.

    In your case, you have mentioned that you are going to accept more responsibility than that has been stated in PERM, so AC21 is inevitable. As long as you are in the same line of work, I think you should be okay.

    Anyone else has inputs for "fuzzy logic"?

    I think there will have to AC21 invoked as there is change in the job location. Secondly I will be going from Senior Assurance Associate to Assurance Manager. There will be additional responsibilities from what I already have.

    I hope this H1B amendment will not impede in anyway the GC process. Would it? Thanks!




    kim kardashian 2011. Kim Kardashian 2011 People#39;s
  • Kim Kardashian 2011 People#39;s


  • jugunu64
    09-27 03:33 PM
    Question:
    Quick question pertaining to different "A#" on I-140 & I-485. Is this a mistake by the Service or normal process?

    I-140: A099 XXX XXX
    I-485, I-765 & I-131: A088 XXX XXX


    Attorney Response:
    It is the I-485 A# that counts and we have seen this before without any apparent problem.



    more...

    kim kardashian 2011. kim kardashian 2011. kim
  • kim kardashian 2011. kim


  • waitnwatch
    04-03 05:43 PM
    I guess Amartya Sen the Nobel Prize (technically not actually called a Nobel) winner in Economics is still a green card holder.

    By the way you guys could also check out Prof. C. R. Rao at Penn State. His website is http://www.stat.psu.edu/people/faculty/crrao.html
    http://www.amstat.org/about/statisticians/index.cfm?fuseaction=biosinfo&BioID=13

    Dr. Rao was awarded the National Medal of Science, the nation's highest award for lifetime achievement in fields of scientific research, in June 2002.




    kim kardashian 2011. socialite Kim Kardashian
  • socialite Kim Kardashian


  • ujjvalkoul
    03-06 01:14 PM
    do they normally send a receipt notice for the new 765 application that you file to correct EAD error...?

    i.e. if we do not receive a RECEIPT NOTICE in like 2 -3 months- should we follow up by Infopass or Calling 1800 number? OR just wait!!! for 4 months to end and then call and infopass



    more...

    kim kardashian 2011. Kim Kardashian – 2011 Kids
  • Kim Kardashian – 2011 Kids


  • TeddyKoochu
    10-14 04:34 PM
    Spring 2010 (http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eAgendaViewRule?pubId=201004&RIN=1615-AB82)

    Sakthisagar & RSM144 many thanks for posting, the spring document has a target date of Oct 2010, I believe there is a chance of this happening sometime with the fee increase, they will have a fee for this. Hope this rule comes into play it is good news for us.




    kim kardashian 2011. kim kardashian 2011. kim
  • kim kardashian 2011. kim


  • akred
    07-25 08:04 PM
    I have found that SBI is the most cost effective one. There is some inconvienience as you have to register with them, but every transfer after that can be accomplished with a fax to their offices.



    more...

    kim kardashian 2011. kim kardashian 2011 pics.
  • kim kardashian 2011 pics.


  • nviren
    04-13 07:58 PM
    The following doc, 'How the senate bill becomes a law' does not mention any waiting period after President's sign the bill to become a law

    http://www.senate.gov/reference/resources/pdf/legprocessflowchart.pdf




    kim kardashian 2011. Kim Kardashian 2011 April
  • Kim Kardashian 2011 April


  • rahulpaper
    11-09 10:04 AM
    We have a very similar case as yours...No FP and RFE on AP....
    our 485 is NSC>CSC>NSC ...hence it is slow...my lawyer asked to wait for another month (60 from notice days)
    RFE on AP is processed at NSC>CSC...

    which means my 485 is back in NSC and AP is still at CSC....no connection between two applications.



    more...

    kim kardashian 2011. kim kardashian 2011 style.
  • kim kardashian 2011 style.


  • basav
    08-04 07:58 PM
    Hi, thanks

    Point 2 looks doable..

    Point 1 also make sense if I apply for premium COS for self with future date say 6 weeks from now as effetive date for H1, after i come to know it is approved in 2 weeks time I will get my family here on L2 before effective H1 date and then apply for there COS thru regular after they are here, my last question here is is it possible to apply premium COS specifying future date as effective to start working on H1




    kim kardashian 2011. kim kardashian 2011. kim
  • kim kardashian 2011. kim


  • sai_dt2000
    04-28 12:32 PM
    Could be finger printing appointment letter.



    more...

    kim kardashian 2011. Kim Kardashian at the 2011
  • Kim Kardashian at the 2011


  • canmt
    10-19 01:25 PM
    The guideline issued by the Director of USCIS to field officers to interpret AC 21 does not take into consideration the geographic location of the new employer.

    I cannot say how USCIS will interpret AC 21 cases where the salary is more or less than prevailing wages specified in labor certification but USCIS will issue a request for evidence to get a letter from your new employer to state that your terms and conditions of approved labor certification continue to exist.

    This could mean the new employer has no obligation to pay you as per your labor certification but once the green card is approved he would pay the money mentioned in the labor certification. No one can enforce this since both you and employer will look for bottom line profits.

    If you have an offer with same or more money than the privileging wage determination in your approved labor certification you should be good but I don’t know how USCIS will interpret the AC 21 where geographic location of the employer is different. For example if the labor is certified in NYC with 120k and I take up 100k job at Raleigh more than prevailing wage for that location and currently i'm paid 75k till I get my green card as employer is not obligated to pay the salary as per wage determination in NYC.

    I hope this helps and good luck on your green card chase.




    kim kardashian 2011. kim kardashian 2011 april.
  • kim kardashian 2011 april.


  • leoindiano
    03-17 12:35 PM
    I have a priority date of March 2004 (EB2 India) and I am still waiting for my Green Card. I think majority of the 2004 filers are in the same boat except for a lucky few who were able to get the green card after the July fiasco.

    So don't buildup your hopes too high. I firmly beleive that very soon there will be a repeat of what we saw last year in July and the green cards will be distributed once again out of order.

    So if you are one of those luck ones, you might get it.

    Good Luck!!

    You must have applied for I-485 after july 1st, correct?



    more...

    kim kardashian 2011. Kim Kardashian 2011: Kim
  • Kim Kardashian 2011: Kim


  • anilsal
    08-21 02:04 PM
    not only that you got GC but also you made a one time contribution to IV.




    kim kardashian 2011. kim kardashian 2011 style.
  • kim kardashian 2011 style.


  • glus
    06-28 04:47 PM
    O MY GOD !! You are so right............guys.. check out Rajiv Khanna's web site, Check out Sheela Murthy's web site, USCIS.....everyone is saying the same.........we are royally screwed. God Helppppppppppp

    You are as stupid as what you wrote.



    more...

    kim kardashian 2011. kim kardashian 2011.
  • kim kardashian 2011.


  • h1techSlave
    01-27 08:48 AM
    Initially I also thought that this bill would remove 40, 000 numbers from the numerical queue. But in reality that may not be the case. 40, 000 is the EB1 quota. How many of those are PhDs? Anecdotal evidence is that majority of EB1 now goes to International managers. So number wise this bill may not do much.

    But I wholeheartedly support this bill. Even if this removes 5, 000 people from the queue. It is better than nothing. 5, 000 is two years worth of EB3-I quota :) :)

    Even if its only for Phd's ....40,000 More Visas will be available for EB2 and EB3
    i think EB2 Back log will be wiped away just in 1 year and fall down will be there for EB3.




    kim kardashian 2011. kim kardashian 2011 fashion.
  • kim kardashian 2011 fashion.


  • mpadapa
    06-19 10:00 AM
    bump




    kim kardashian 2011. 4 of 16. Kim Kardashian
  • 4 of 16. Kim Kardashian


  • vallabhu
    01-31 04:57 PM
    Will accept any suitable combination of Education , training or expeirence in lieu of stated requirements.



    If you have more than three years of experience before applying for Labor you are fine else you might get a query and if you answer with education evaluation proving that your study and exp is equivalent to 4 year bachelor you will b fine.




    polapragada
    09-04 12:41 AM
    i see perm approvals with PD of may 16th...(chicago)
    my Pd is may 2nd..how did they miss my case?????

    is there anyway i can check my labor status??? :confused:

    Checking Status of PERM can be done your Employer or Lawyer
    In DOL web site with the C-08xxx-xxxxx Number

    Employee can't check the status directly




    senthil1
    07-12 12:01 AM
    Various conspiracy theories are

    1. They made all PD current for July to encourage legal immigrants to support CIR. CIR is failed they backed out on July. But it has weak argument as they moved PD for about 2 years in previous month.

    2. They made PD current based on rules and regulations as 60k Visa was available. But USCIS may lose fees increase so they backed out to get more revenue. If this is correct they will make all PD current in Oct 2007. But I do not think this will be reason as just for more money for Organization anyone will risk their career. If anyone gets personal financial gain then they might do but here there is no chance for that

    3. Because first 2 weeks of June not much approvals of I485 DOS made all PD current. But when USCIS started approving cases they realized that there were enough applications already and alerted DOS and DOS issued revised VB
    4. USCIS does not want flooding of I485 applications as that will be shown up as backlog. To prevent that they asked DOS to issue revised VB



    There is going to be 3 important questions in Lawsuit(If court accepts lawsuit for consideration) or congress hearing(if happens)

    1. Whether DOS or USCIS violated law in issuing revised VB.
    2. Whether they violated law in bypassing FBI check for applications to make Visa numbers unavailable
    3. Why they could not accept the I485 applications based on First VB? What is the need for issuing revised VB?



    If this is true it's really horrible and scary that this gov. agency is handling our applications.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment