Tuesday, June 14, 2011

2004 Chevrolet Colorado Ls Regular Cab

images 2004 Chevrolet Colorado LS Z71 2004 Chevrolet Colorado Ls Regular Cab. Bed. 2004 Chevrolet
  • Bed. 2004 Chevrolet


  • Joozz
    09-21 09:50 AM
    Or may be the fact that they gave me new visa in the embassy means that everything fine with that extension?




    wallpaper Bed. 2004 Chevrolet 2004 Chevrolet Colorado Ls Regular Cab. 2005 Chevrolet Colorado LS
  • 2005 Chevrolet Colorado LS


  • purgan
    11-09 11:09 AM
    Now that the restrictionists blew the election for the Republicans, they're desperately trying to rally their remaining troops and keep up their morale using immigration scare tactics....

    If the Dems could vote against HR 4437 and for S 2611 in an election year and still win the majority, whose going to care for this piece of S#*t?

    Another interesting observation: Its back to being called a Bush-McCain-Kennedy Amnesty....not the Reid-Kennedy Amnesty...


    ========
    National Review
    "Interesting Opportunities"
    Are amnesty and open borders in our future?

    By Mark Krikorian

    Before election night was even over, White House spokesman Tony Snow said the Democratic takeover of the House presented “interesting opportunities,” including a chance to pass “comprehensive immigration reform” — i.e., the president’s plan for an illegal-alien amnesty and enormous increases in legal immigration, which failed only because of House Republican opposition..

    At his press conference Wednesday, the president repeated this sentiment, citing immigration as “vital issue … where I believe we can find some common ground with the Democrats.”

    Will the president and the Democrats get their way with the new lineup next year?

    Nope.

    That’s not to say the amnesty crowd isn’t hoping for it. Tamar Jacoby, the tireless amnesty supporter at the otherwise conservative Manhattan Institute, in a recent piece in Foreign Affairs eagerly anticipated a Republican defeat, “The political stars will realign, perhaps sooner than anyone expects, and when they do, Congress will return to the task it has been wrestling with: how to translate the emerging consensus into legislation to repair the nation's broken immigration system.”

    In Newsweek, Fareed Zakaria shares Jacoby’s cluelessness about Flyover Land: “The great obstacle to immigration reform has been a noisy minority. … Come Tuesday, the party will be over. CNN’s Lou Dobbs and his angry band of xenophobes will continue to rail, but a new Congress, with fewer Republicans and no impending primary elections, would make the climate much less vulnerable to the tyranny of the minority.”

    And fellow immigration enthusiast Fred Barnes earlier this week blamed the coming Republican defeat in part on the failure to pass an amnesty and increase legal immigration: “But imagine if Republicans had agreed on a compromise and enacted a ‘comprehensive’ — Mr. Bush’s word — immigration bill, dealing with both legal and illegal immigrants. They’d be justifiably basking in their accomplishment. The American public, except for nativist diehards, would be thrilled.”

    “Emerging consensus”? “Nativist diehards”? Jacoby and her fellow-travelers seem to actually believe the results from her hilariously skewed polling questions, and those of the mainstream media, all larded with pro-amnesty codewords like “comprehensive reform” and “earned legalization,” and offering respondents the false choice of mass deportations or amnesty.

    More responsible polling employing neutral language (avoiding accurate but potentially provocative terminology like “amnesty” and “illegal alien”) finds something very different. In a recent national survey by Kellyanne Conway, when told the level of immigration, 68 percent of likely voters said it was too high and only 2 percent said it was too low. Also, when offered the full range of choices of what to do about the existing illegal population, voters rejected both the extremes of legalization (“amnesty” to you and me) and mass deportations; instead, they preferred the approach of this year’s House bill, which sought attrition of the illegal population through consistent immigration law enforcement. Finally, three fourths of likely voters agreed that we have an illegal immigration problem because past enforcement efforts have been “grossly inadequate,” as opposed to the open-borders crowd’s contention that illegal immigration is caused by overly restrictive immigration rules.

    Nor do the results of Tuesday’s balloting bear out the enthusiasts’ claims of a mandate for amnesty. “The test,” Fred Barnes writes, “was in Arizona, where two of the noisiest border hawks, Representatives J.D. Hayworth and Randy Graf, lost House seats.” But while these two somewhat strident voices were defeated (Hayworth voted against the House immigration-enforcement bill because it wasn’t tough enough), the very same voters approved four immigration-related ballot measures by huge margins, to deny bail to illegal aliens, bar illegals from winning punitive damages, bar illegals from receiving state subsidies for education and child care, and declare English the state’s official language.

    More broadly, this was obviously a very bad year for Republicans, leading to the defeat of both enforcement supporters — like John Hostettler (career grade of A- from the pro-control lobbying group Americans for Better Immigration) and Charles Taylor (A) — as well as amnesty promoters, like Mike DeWine (D) and Lincoln Chafee (F). Likewise, the winners included both prominent hawks — Tancredo (A) and Bilbray (A+) — and doves — Lugar (D-), for instance, and probably Heather Wilson (D).

    What’s more, if legalizing illegals is so widely supported by the electorate, how come no Democrats campaigned on it? Not all were as tough as Brad Ellsworth, the Indiana sheriff who defeated House Immigration Subcommittee Chairman Hostettler, or John Spratt of South Carolina, whose immigration web pages might as well have been written by Tom Tancredo. But even those nominally committed to “comprehensive” reform stressed enforcement as job one. And the national party’s “Six for 06” rip-off of the Contract with America said not a word about immigration reform, “comprehensive” or otherwise.

    The only exception to this “Whatever you do, don’t mention the amnesty” approach appears to have been Jim Pederson, the Democrat who challenged Sen. Jon Kyl (a grade of B) by touting a Bush-McCain-Kennedy-style amnesty and foreign-worker program and even praised the 1986 amnesty, which pretty much everyone now agrees was a catastrophe.

    Pederson lost.

    Speaker Pelosi has a single mission for the next two years — to get her majority reelected in 2008. She may be a loony leftist (F- on immigration), but she and Rahm Emanuel (F) seem to be serious about trying to create a bigger tent in order to keep power, and adopting the Bush-McCain-Kennedy amnesty would torpedo those efforts. Sure, it’s likely that they’ll try to move piecemeal amnesties like the DREAM Act (HR 5131 in the current Congress), or increase H-1B visas (the indentured-servitude program for low-wage Indian computer programmers). They might also push the AgJobs bill, which is a sizable amnesty limited to illegal-alien farmworkers. None of these measures is a good idea, and Republicans might still be able to delay or kill them, but they aren’t the “comprehensive” disaster the president and the Democrats really want.

    Any mass-amnesty and worker-importation scheme would take a while to get started, and its effects would begin showing up in the newspapers and in people’s workplaces right about the time the next election season gets under way. And despite the sophistries of open-borders lobbyists, Nancy Pelosi knows perfectly well that this would be bad news for those who supported it.

    —* Mark Krikorian is executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies and an NRO contributor.




    2004 Chevrolet Colorado Ls Regular Cab. 2007 Chevrolet Colorado LS,
  • 2007 Chevrolet Colorado LS,


  • sachug22
    12-10 02:31 PM
    deleted




    2011 2005 Chevrolet Colorado LS 2004 Chevrolet Colorado Ls Regular Cab. I purchased this 2004 Colorado
  • I purchased this 2004 Colorado


  • ujjvalkoul
    01-18 01:24 PM
    Just got email from Buffalo Can Immi Office - Just the Principle applicant needs to take the IELTS test.



    more...

    2004 Chevrolet Colorado Ls Regular Cab. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado
  • 2004 Chevrolet Colorado


  • ilikekilo
    05-05 11:42 AM
    Wasnt there a recent settled law suit that could evnetually force USCIS to consider and work on a petition if its pending for more than 180 days?

    Then I suppose this non concurrent priocessing may be a good thing...isnt it?

    I still cant fathom what would be the real consequences of this non concurrent processing..anyone?

    going to the comments section, I believe its just a "process" to go thru...

    I did submit comments when they proposed fee hike for many gc applications like 485, 140 etc.. they receveid lot of comments BUT they went ahead and increased the fee anwyays...:)




    2004 Chevrolet Colorado Ls Regular Cab. Used 2007 Chevrolet Colorado
  • Used 2007 Chevrolet Colorado


  • DDash
    09-22 11:46 AM
    ....
    Thats what GC means to me.
    ....
    On the other hand...Its just the current state of mind...


    Very well said....Great post. Often times, we get into a "rat" race and get desperate at times. Do the best that you can with what you have. Dont let the lack of GC limit you from achieving your goals. Dont get me wrong, we should fight for our GCs, but at the same time, dont let the desire to get GC stop you from achieving your goals.



    more...

    2004 Chevrolet Colorado Ls Regular Cab. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado Crew
  • 2004 Chevrolet Colorado Crew


  • coopheal
    12-04 05:15 PM
    I cannot make it to the rally but will contribute 100$ towards the efforts.

    Thanks




    2010 2007 Chevrolet Colorado LS, 2004 Chevrolet Colorado Ls Regular Cab. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado LS Z71
  • 2004 Chevrolet Colorado LS Z71


  • nagkad
    09-03 12:19 AM
    Got approval today.
    first received CPO email and later received welcome email.

    PD:12/14/2007
    ND:09/11/2007
    RD:08/01/2007



    more...

    2004 Chevrolet Colorado Ls Regular Cab. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado LS
  • 2004 Chevrolet Colorado LS


  • gc_chahiye
    11-09 01:10 AM
    According to the following document from USCIS they issued receipts for approx 150K applications for AOS in sept. So my estimate of the total back log is


    June filers 75k
    July - 25k
    August 200k
    Sept 150k
    Oct 50K

    Total = 500k

    http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/APPLICATIONS%20FOR%20IMMIGRATION%20BENEFITS_Septem ber07.pdf

    why more filers in Sept than June? I thought most PDs were better in June than in Sept...




    hair I purchased this 2004 Colorado 2004 Chevrolet Colorado Ls Regular Cab. 2008 Chevrolet Colorado
  • 2008 Chevrolet Colorado


  • eb3retro
    03-15 01:15 PM
    Filing 485 during visa unavailability, should not be the concern in this bill. Why our people are worrying about filing AOS when visa number unavailable? Man, this should not be our concern at all. Our main concern should be reinstating the AC21 provision that allow the oversubscribed countries to use excess visas in each EB category. Specter removed very important provision that eliminate per country limit in EB visas for oversubscribed countries. This is a big blow to India, China. It will stop all the benefits from this bill.

    If the current form of specter bill passes, there is no benefit to any of us. If EB visa increased to 290K, excluding dependents from counting from FY 2001, recapturing unused visa from 2001 to 2005, and excluding EB1 (OR+EA) and EB2 (MS+3) from count, that drastically increase the visa numbers. The increase is unimaginable, and I feel that it will be about 4 to 5 times than current 140K numbers. If all the listed provisions appears in the final bill, the visa number will always be �current� for all countries for many years, provided AC21 (elimination of per country limit if demand is less than supply) reinstated. If this happens, no one needs to worry about filing AOS when visa number unavailable. That situation never arises.

    If current form of Specter bill passes, all the new numbers created thro above listed provisions, will not give any benefit to India/China. DOS simply say per country limit is 10% only no matter what. Remember that, 10% is total of FB+EB numbers. (480000+290000). India and China FB numbers are also heavily backlogged. Therefore our main concern is to reinstate AC21 provision not filing AOS, and keep pressure to keep the listed provisions (EB visa increased to 290K, excluding dependents from counting from FY 2001, recapturing unused visa from 2001 to 2005, and excluding EB1 (OR+EA) and EB2 (MS+3)) in the final bill


    this person is bringing some valid points to ponder. People please go through her posting and i agree with her regarding the numbers is still 10% only for india. we need to fight for removing the per country limit, or else, we may probably be in this retrogression mess for quite sometime.



    more...

    2004 Chevrolet Colorado Ls Regular Cab. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado
  • 2004 Chevrolet Colorado


  • glosrfc
    11-26 11:20 AM
    @TheCanadian, glos is a cunning one. :look:

    Unfortunately, that's not the case. If it were, I might've tried to make my buttons look more like...well, buttons. :suppose_maybe:

    But it was fun making them and I've had some ideas for new themes!




    hot 2004 Chevrolet Colorado 2004 Chevrolet Colorado Ls Regular Cab. The Colorado truck is the
  • The Colorado truck is the


  • maddipati1
    02-03 02:27 PM
    thank you veni, that is very informative and solid reference.

    looks like under 'advanced degree' category, just having a US Masters or foreign equivalent (4+2) is enough. lot of people are under the impression, its MS+3yrs. but the description in USCIS link states just an advanced degree (higher than baccalaureate) is enough. am i reading this right?

    BS+5years is equivalent to having an Advanced degree.
    But, I think its BS+5yrs, not BS Equivalent + 5 yrs.



    I think it can be, but when the job requirement Bachelor Equivalent+ 5Year then it opens up for a wide range.

    You can show BS equivalence by 3 yr degree+1 yr degree or 3yr degree + 2 yr degree.....etc

    For additional info Please click here (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.eb1d4c2a3e5b9ac89243c6a7543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=816a83453d4a3210VgnVCM100000b92ca60aRCR D&vgnextchannel=816a83453d4a3210VgnVCM100000b92ca60a RCRD) or here (http://www.murthy.com/eb2.html)



    more...

    house 2004 Chevrolet Colorado LS Z71 2004 Chevrolet Colorado Ls Regular Cab. 2004 Chevy Colorado LS crew
  • 2004 Chevy Colorado LS crew


  • gjoe
    10-05 09:41 AM
    The best way to first start the changes to happen is to file a law suit against USCIS. If we can find a bunch of people would have the same kind of application credentials and different PD were the later PD application was approved we can sue USCIS for losses in personal life and career due to their ineffeciency.
    How many of you would be intersted in a law suit like this. If we have even a hunder people to file a law suit we will get more media publicity and our problem will get more recogniction than rallies and lobbying.




    tattoo Used 2007 Chevrolet Colorado 2004 Chevrolet Colorado Ls Regular Cab. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado reg
  • 2004 Chevrolet Colorado reg


  • pitha
    07-08 03:11 PM
    I was one of the people who bashed Oh when he "sympathizes" with USCIS workers, I could not figure out what he was thinking sympathizing with USCIS workers.

    In this case he is helping publicize the flower campaign. Why are you guys bashing him instead of thanking him? IV core has clearly stated the flower campaign and some other initiatives are member initiatives and not IV initiatives so I can understand why Mathew Oh might have left out IV. Let�s not make an enemy out of a friend who is trying to help us in this particular situation.



    more...

    pictures 2004 Chevrolet Colorado Crew 2004 Chevrolet Colorado Ls Regular Cab. Chevrolet : Colorado LS
  • Chevrolet : Colorado LS


  • rc0878
    09-23 10:35 AM
    I think as far it does not say unknown, we should be good....but still we should atleast discuss this wit our respective attorneys and post our findings in here.

    BTW, mine is blank also.



    To answer your question the Priority date column is NULL ( i mean blank) for most of us in 485 Receipt Notice.

    But the "Section : " is showing UNKNOWN for some of us and showing something else for others...

    I'm wondering if that could be an issue - shall we call USCIS to fix this ?




    dresses The Colorado truck is the 2004 Chevrolet Colorado Ls Regular Cab. Chevrolet : Colorado LS
  • Chevrolet : Colorado LS


  • txh1b
    04-15 09:33 AM
    You have no choice but leave US immediately, go for CP, declare your overstay in the DS156 form, come clean to the VO and hope they forgive it.

    Good Luck!



    more...

    makeup 2004 Chevrolet Colorado LS 2004 Chevrolet Colorado Ls Regular Cab. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado LS Z71
  • 2004 Chevrolet Colorado LS Z71


  • chris
    02-08 11:05 PM
    Did you contacted congressman or opened any SR's ?

    I'm also in the same boat. Cases after me are getting approved.:)




    girlfriend 2004 Chevrolet Colorado reg 2004 Chevrolet Colorado Ls Regular Cab. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado LS
  • 2004 Chevrolet Colorado LS


  • pani_6
    02-09 09:48 AM
    Yes this option is open...the sitiuation is getting ridicilous by the day..lets wait for couple of months so see if SKIL OR CIR take some direction..meanwhile nothin prevents us from preparing
    grounds for a law suit!!




    hairstyles 2004 Chevrolet Colorado 2004 Chevrolet Colorado Ls Regular Cab. 2004 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD
  • 2004 Chevrolet Colorado 2WD


  • JeffDG
    01-26 03:28 PM
    Waste of time. How many PhD's are there as compared to the others? There is already EB1/EB2-NIW for them

    EB1A/EB1B/EB2NIW still consume visa numbers.




    knowDOL
    04-24 11:05 AM
    Looks like this rule may not come into effect for fiscal year 2006 ie 30th september 2006. lookat todays immigration-law post.




    kaisersose
    06-02 04:05 PM
    can i get a h1 done from a desi employer just to protect the h4 status and join the other company thats offering me a job with my ead.

    the h1 from the desi employer will not be having pay stubs but thats only to get h1 status.

    For you or for her? Getting a H is not easy (you will have to wait till Oct 2009) and maintaining a H without paystubs is not legal either. Should be far more easier & quicker for her to get a F visa.

    In general, avoid getting into risk situations that you cannot get out of. In the long run, being safe with immigration matters and resisting the temptation to make a few extra bucks will be more beneficial.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment